However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 11, 2018, the Defendant calls to the Victim B (32:32) who is an employee of the morning and calls to the victim B (32:3) who is an employee of the morning, and “I cannot immediately manage the customer.”

Although the above victim was able to see, “cryped, grow up only me, and is bad,” the victim’s vehicle was returned to the office of the company, and the victim was able to see, following the vehicle’s vehicle’s return to the office of the company, and the victim was able to see the back of the victim’s head by drinking the vehicle, and the victim was able to see the part of the victim’s head, which is a dangerous object in the vehicle, and the part of the victim’s name was dyped once and dyped twice, and the part of the victim’s body was dyped twice in the column of the tea inserted, and damaged the victim’s character of other part of the part requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Photographss of damaged parts and photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the fact that the criminal defendant committed the crime of this case, the fact that the criminal defendant committed the crime of this case, the fact that the criminal defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case shall be considered);