beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.08 2013고단5440

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 5440"

1. On January 8, 201, the Defendant: (a) made use of a computer unit process without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office of Dyang Pondo Dondo, in the end of the month following the delivery of the said site and J on January 8, 201; (b) made use of the computer unit process; (c) “No confirmation of job payment; (d) the name of the Corporation; (c) the original contractor: (d) the representative director G; (e) the subcontractor; (d) the representative representative director I; (e) the subcontractor; (e) the subcontractor; and (e) the subcontractor participating in the said site and J; (e) the subcontractor’s participation in the said construction; and (e) the subcontractor’s consent to the direct payment of the Dondo; and (e) the representative director’s consent to the establishment of the Fondo; and (e) the owner’s official seal and the subcontractor’s seal in the name of the representative director under his name and seal affixed to G.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place of the above paragraph (1) above, exercised the foregoing fact to K representative who was unaware of the fact that the certificate of non-performance of a forged position was genuine.

3. On January 6, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works for steel framed with the victim K at the construction site of the Dayang-si, Dayang-si, Dayang-si, and the same month;

8. The Plaintiff: (a) drafted a direct and non-written confirmation with the effect that (b) the Plaintiff supplied steel materials to the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff would pay the steel materials directly to the Plaintiff; and (c) stated that “(d) the Plaintiff would pay the steel materials directly; (b) the Plaintiff would not be aware of the attempted construction of the steel materials; and (c) would cause the Plaintiff to proceed with steel construction.”

However, the defendant did not have obtained consent from G of the F representative director with respect to the direct payment of material price, and the above direct payment certificate is without authority of the defendant.