When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 9, 2016, the Defendant was urged to return home because the Defendant’s drinking within convenience points was prohibited from being conducted within a convenience store from a police officer belonging to the police officer belonging to the E District Police Station in the Dong-dong Police Station in the Dong-dong Police Station in the Jeju, Jeju, who was reported to drink within the D convenience store in Jeju, around 04:45 on January 9, 2016.

Mambs, Mambs and Mambs, which are to be raised up by preventing Mambs.

In accordance with the Babbbb, the balp used the balp of the damaged police officer by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report by police officers who wear a uniform and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

The circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing: There is no previous conviction.