손해배상(기)
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
Defendant 149,460,847 won and 54,117,647 won and 647 won to Plaintiff A.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 9:
The status of the parties A was deceased on March 4, 1990 by Plaintiff B’s children, and Plaintiff C’s reference was deceased on March 4, 1990.
C and Plaintiff B’s children are South Korea, and in addition to Plaintiff A who inherited Australia, Do, his father and son, who were married on February 4, 1985.
B. On April 21, 1977, Plaintiff A was a student of the Republic of Korea from the Republic of Korea to the F University Social Department of the Republic of Korea. On April 21, 1977, Plaintiff A was forced by the Army Security Headquarters (hereinafter “Security Agency”) in the House located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and was investigated by being detained illegally in the security room for 22 days from May 12, 197, when the warrant of detention was issued and executed.
At the time, Plaintiff A was subject to adviser and assault, such as she was flaged with a monet or face, she was flaging on the face, and she was in fact engaged in a espionage activity or a violation of the National Security Act. However, even though she did not engage in a espionage activity or a violation of the National Security Act, Plaintiff A did not have any adviser and assault as mentioned above.
C. On June 18, 197, Plaintiff A was indicted for a violation of espionage, National Security Act violation, anti-public law violation, and Presidential Emergency Decree No. 9 by Seoul District Criminal Court 77Da465 on June 18, 197, and the same court found Defendant A guilty of all the above charges and sentenced Plaintiff A life imprisonment on October 28, 197.
On March 9, 1978, the appellate court reversed the judgment below and sentenced the plaintiff A to 10 years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications for 10 years.
(hereinafter “The Judgment on Review”). The Plaintiff appealed against the judgment subject to a review but dismissed on June 13, 1978 by Supreme Court Decision 78Do756, which is the judgment subject to a review.