2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer appointed as a policeman on August 4, 1990 and promoted to the Superintendent on April 23, 2014. From January 29, 2019 to January 29, 201, the head of the Seoul B police station investigation division is serving as a police officer.

1 The Plaintiff instructed the investigator in charge of the disciplinary cause No. 1 to suspend the investigation of the instant case (No. 2018-8468) to the investigator in charge of the instant case, and ordered the suspect DF to postpone the suspect D's appearance upon the request of the suspect D-type E in the instant case (No. 2018-8468), thereby allowing the suspect D's appearance to be postponed for two months.

(2) With respect to the instant case (No. 200 million won (No. 2018-1900) for which a correctional officer committed fraud, the Plaintiff instructed the investigator in charge of G to “I would like to be able to obtain money from the complainant or not,” and delayed the transfer of the case by ordering the investigator in charge of G to “I would like to have the complainant receive money.” On the other hand, the record was deducted.

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason No. 1-B” 2: (a) Although the relevant investigator F recommended that he/she will transfer the case in connection with the embezzlement accusation case (No. 2018-1989) for which no jurisdiction is recognized to the Seoul Police Station, the relevant investigator F should not transfer the case and directly investigate the case.

From February 1, 2018 to February 1, 2018, the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the instant disciplinary cause for disciplinary action

8. Despite the fact that it was friendly, such as making a currency over 306 times until March 31, 200, H did not perform its duty to avoid the accusation case where H embezzled 3.4 billion won.

(2) The Plaintiff did not perform its duty to avoid a crime of false accusation in the case where the friendly job offering JJ, which was introduced and known at the time of the work of the I police station, filed a complaint.

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 3-B”). (b)

The Central Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers of the National Police Agency on April 2, 2019, at the time that the Plaintiff was in office as the director of the Economic Crime Investigation Division of Seoul Police Station on January 23, 2018: or

8.7.) Any of the following acts (hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason”) shall be subject to the order of the following acts:

(a).