However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 11, 2014, at around 23:10, the Defendant: (a) expressed his identification card to the Defendant, who had been engaged in patrol service, was able to go to the road on which D, who had been interfering with traffic while going to the road on the roads, at around 329, Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Busan; (b) stated that D, who had been engaged in patrol service, was able to take a bath for shot, dead, and discarded; and (c) assessed the above D’s upper part at one time on drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above D, who is a police officer, and interfered with the execution of duties of the patrol service of the D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on the hearing of police officersD statements);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Where the scope of punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties (a person who has been specially mitigated) is minor (a person in January or August) in the area of mitigation (a person in charge of obstruction of performance of official duties) (a person in special mitigation] [a decision of sentence], but there are many criminal records of the criminal defendant, but there are no criminal records of the criminal defendant, under the influence of alcohol, there are no criminal records of the same kind, and the degree of violence is relatively minor, and the punishment shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentence in consideration of the sentencing conditions stipulated in

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.