(i) Injury by occupational negligence, occupational injury

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, the defendant shall be the defendant for the period calculated by converting one million won into one day.

shall be confined in a workhouse.

except that the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Medical Service Providers);

The defendant is a person who operates a trade name "B" in Ulsan ○○○ underground.

피고인은 의사가 아님에도 , 2014 . 12 . 19 . 17 : 00경 위 ' B ' 가게에서 그곳에 찾아온 C의 오른쪽 귀를 소독용 솜으로 소독하고 낱개로 밀봉된 일회용 바늘을 소독용 에탄 올로 소독한 다음 바늘 앞쪽의 뾰족한 부분에 후시딘 연고를 바르고 바늘의 뒤쪽 구멍 부분에는 피어싱 귀걸이를 끼운 뒤 위 바늘로 C의 오른쪽 귀 귓불과 연골 부분을 찔 러 구멍 2개를 뚫은 것을 비롯하여 2014년 가을부터 위 일시까지 위 가게를 찾아온 매달 평균 6 ~ 7명의 불특정 다수의 손님들에게 같은 방법으로 귀에 구멍을 뚫어주고 킷 불 부분은 3 , 000원 , 연골 부분은 5 , 000원을 받았다 .

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a doctor, the defendant was engaged in medical practice for profit.

2. Injury by occupational negligence;

피고인은 위 일시에 위 ' B ' 가게에서 피해자 C ( 여 , 23세 ) 의 오른쪽 귀의 귓불과 연 골 부분에 구멍을 뚫는 시술을 하였다 . 이 경우 피시술자의 해당 부위에 상처 , 염증이 발생할 위험이 높아 위 시술을 하는 사람으로서는 의사면허를 받고 관련법령에 따른 시설을 갖추어야 하며 시술 시설 및 도구 등을 청결히 유지하고 피시술자의 신체적 특 성 , 시술부위 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 적절한 시술방법을 사용하고 시술 후 감염이 발생하지 않도록 관리하는 등 사고를 미리 방지하여야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있었다 .

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not have necessary facilities without obtaining a medical doctor’s license, and did not prevent infections to the victim, thereby causing the victim to suffer injury to ties of ties, which require hospitalized treatment for about 19 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol of police statement concerning C;

1. Written Opinions, Certificates of Medical Treatment

1. A complaint, a photograph, a copy of the Kakao Stockholm message, and a petition;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements made by victims);

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

Article 5 subparagraph 1 of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes, Article 27 of the Medical Service Act.

Article 268 (Appointment of Imprisonment and Imposition of Fines) of the Criminal Act (Bodily Injury resulting from Occupational Negligence, and Imprisonment without prison labor)

x)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, 38 (2), and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of execution;

Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reasons for sentencing

[Scope of Recommendation Form]

Type 2 (Business Unlicensed Medical Practice) No. 3 (1 year to June 2)

[Special Mitigation]

Where the medical practice itself objectively pose a risk or shows the treatment effect;

【Determination of Sentence】

피고인이 초범인 점 , 피해자를 위하여 100만 원을 공탁한 점 , 피고인의 의료행위 자 체는 귓불과 연골 부분에 귀걸이를 끼울 구멍을 뚫는 것으로서 객관적으로 위험성이

It is small that the Defendant committed the instant crime for living is an element of sentencing favorable to the Defendant.

The victim suffered from the injury of this case several times, and the defendant does not seem to have an attitude to seek a letter while committing the crime of death with a serious mind. In addition, even though the agreed amount was given more than the amount initially presented, even though it was presented more than 1,50,000 won, it was rejected and did not reach an agreement and requested a strict punishment against the defendant, it is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

Other conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various conditions of sentencing.