When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall engage in any business activity that disturbs public morals, such as making male and female juveniles lodge together, or provide a place for such business activity.

Nevertheless, on January 16, 2016, the Defendant, as the owner of the DNA telecom in Dao City, did not verify the identity of E (17 years old), F (15 years old, female), a juvenile, who was a guest in the above Madooel on January 16, 2016, and had him be accommodated in 508 of the above Madooel.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 58 Subparag. 5 of the pertinent Act and Article 30 Subparag. 8 of the Act on the Protection of Youth from which a person was sentenced to criminal facts and Article 58 Subparag. 5 and Article 30 Subparag. 8 of the Act on the Protection of Youth from which a person was sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime (the Defendant’s spouse, who was a joint operator, had no record of being sentenced to punishment for the same crime). However, the Defendant’s wife, who was a joint operator of the youth, was controlled by the same kind of crime on the last two occasions and did not actually

Considering that it is difficult to see as a middle student)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.