2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

C. On February 18, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into the instant primary currency option contract at the Daegu Corporate Finance Branch of a Bank, with the following content:

(Self) The content set forth in subparagraph 2-1 and subparagraph 7-1 of the evidence set forth in subparagraph 2-A. The defendant (State) of the concluding bank, but the contract term of one year of European Type of European (EURPEN OPON) contract (from February 18, 2008 to February 17, 2009): USD 500,000/ 1,000 of the agreed exchange rate of 953 won at the exchange rate of KI exchange rate of 920 won (in the event that the contract period is 920 won or less, the contract price at a certain level): The exchange rate of KI exchange rate of 920 won (in the event that the contract period is 920 won or less, the contract price at a certain level): the contract price at which the right to use the underlying asset can be sold at the time of exercising the right to use the underlying asset * the exchange rate at a certain level * the exchange rate of exchange rate under which the right to use the underlying asset can be sold at a certain time*.

D. On March 3, 2008, the Plaintiff concluded the instant secondary currency option contract at the bank, racing, and corporate finance branch of Defendant (State) with the following content:

(Self Tax content is referred to as Gap evidence 3). The contract term of 1 year (from March 3, 2008 to March 2, 2009) contract amount of 1,000,000 USD 50,000/ 1,000,000 won at the exchange rate of 95 won at the exchange rate of 1,00,000 won at the agreed exchange rate of 1,00,000, 995 won at the exchange rate of KS 995 won at the exchange rate of KS ( call option).

E. The exchange rate after the instant currency option contract overall rise, 1,000 won in or out of 1,000 won in or out of 208 from March 2008 to April 2008. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20090, Aug. 2, 2008>