1. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at around 16:32 on December 5, 2013, the Defendant presented the Defendant’s resident registration certificate to verify his/her identity, and used another person’s resident registration certificate in an unlawful manner.

2. The Defendant forged the signature of another person for the purpose of exercising his/her seal, stating that it is B in the column, which is the statement of the police preparation B, at the time and place mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1), submitted the above written statement to C by police officers affiliated with the above police station who knew of the forgery, and exercised the forged private signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Entry of the police protocol on B and the application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Illegal use of another person's resident registration certificate as indicated in the judgment: Subparagraph 10 of Article 37 of the Resident Registration Act;

B. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(c) The fact that the above investigation and signature is held: Article 239(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;