2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The parties concerned are medical corporations operating an Asian University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Young-si, the World Cup 164, and the Plaintiff was a person who undergone the operation for the Hayang removal on July 16, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant operation”).

B. (1) On June 19, 2013, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital. From November 2012 at that time, the Plaintiff complained for the symptoms showing the left hand handout since 2012. (2) The Plaintiff underwent various inspections at the Defendant Hospital from June 20, 2013. The Plaintiff, who is a medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital, was found to have approximately KRW 7 cm on the upper part of the left body of the Plaintiff, while explaining that the Plaintiff was a vegetable species that were derived from the upper chronology, and that there was a possibility of bad weather, and that the date of the surgery should be cut off by an operation method, and that the date of the surgery was July 16, 2013.

3) On July 15, 2013, the day immediately before the surgery, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant Hospital to hear explanations related to the surgery, and prepared various written consents, and received various tests for the surgery. 4) On July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff underwent the instant surgery under the Plaintiff’s house from around 09:0 to 13:40, under the Defendant Hospital professor’s house, from July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff was found to have been in the instant surgery. During the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was found to have been in the Plaintiff’s satisfyed with the Plaintiff’s satch gun, and explained the Plaintiff’s satisfying of the surgery, and explained the Plaintiff’s satisfying, and the possibility of damaging the satchological guns, and conducted the surgery with the

5 The Plaintiff entered a patient room after the instant surgery, and was transferred to a general sick room on July 17, 2013, following the date of the instant surgery.

After the operation of the instant case, the Plaintiff showed the left-hand satise and satisfy’s awareness, and the professor B doubtful the possibility of damage to the satisfyne, and conducted a consultation with the satisfy.

On July 18, 2013, the Plaintiff complained of the appeal that he could not drive his arms, and the professor B is the professor.