beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.02 2014가합5900

명의신탁해지를원인으로한 소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendants are listed in the separate sheet No. 3 among each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 attached hereto to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff is a clan consisting of both men and women of 20 years of age and over, who are 16 years of age from the view of the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant H is the title holder of the preservation registration of the 1/5 shares of the real estate listed in the attached Table 2 List of Real Estate (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”). The remainder of the Defendants except Defendant H, along with Defendant H, are the successors of T&T, U, V, and W, who are the persons who registered the preservation of the 1/5 shares of each real estate of this case.

B. Defendant H and T, U,V, and W, each of the instant real estate owned by the Plaintiff. At the time of the forest land situation in 1918, the Plaintiff re-titled each of the instant real estate to the Defendant H and T, U, V, V, and W, with the view to having T, X (Defendant H’s lighting division), Y (W), Z (V’s white part), and A(U’s name receive the circumstances of the instant real estate in its name. around 1956, Defendant H and T, U,V, and W, who are the lineal descendants of the name of the circumstances, re-titled each of the instant real estate. Accordingly, Defendant H and T, U,V, and W completed a registration of preservation of ownership on June 197, 1956 with respect to each of the instant real estate, each of the instant real estate owned by the Defendants, as indicated in attached Form 1/57, 200 each of the instant real estate inheritance, T, and T, V, and each of the Defendants’ shares.

W shares were succeeded to Defendant I, J, and K by each agreement division through AB, and the above Defendants filed a share registration on March 30, 2009, as stated in the Defendants’ share in attached Form 3.

On August 24, 2014, the Plaintiff expressed to Defendant B, C, D, E, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K the intent to terminate the title trust.

On the other hand, on September 1, 2014 and November 20, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to this court each of the instant complaints containing the purport that the title trust will be terminated to Defendant L, M, N,O, P, and Q. A duplicate of each of the instant complaints to Defendant L, M, and N is the same as Defendant L, M, and P.