2. Considering that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, support for a fluorous mother, support for a work life in good faith, and that workplace rent is flighted against the Defendant, etc., the Defendant had been sentenced once a suspended sentence due to driving without a license, etc., once a fine was sentenced, and once a fine was sentenced four times due to the previous crime (the Defendant did not obtain a driver’s license), and when taking into account all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, "A previous conviction in the judgment of the court below shall be deemed to delete the part of the criminal records as stated in the first head and the summary of the evidence."