특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter cargo vehicles.
At around 12:10 on July 31, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on the road in front of the Seo-ri 491, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-ri, Seo-ri, Seo-do, and proceeded with the first-lane road in the direction from the Seo-ri, Seo-ri, the Defendant, by negligence, failed to perform the duty of Jeonyang-ri to the sub-de Station, led to the left-hand part of the E- Pested vehicle owned by the victim D (Age 49) who was parked on the right-hand right-hand right-hand side of the Defendant’s truck.
The Defendant, by the foregoing negligence, destroyed the above Amateur car to be repaired in KRW 3,237,230,00, such as penting seals, thereby causing the victim to conceal the Defendant’s vehicle, and did not take necessary measures after the accident.
2. On July 31, 2012, the Defendant continued to run after a traffic accident under Article 1(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) on July 12:11, 2012, the lower part of the G Poter driving seat of the victim F (age 51), which was proceeding at the front bank due to negligence, was received as the front part of the truck driver’s freight.
The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the Defendant, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and, at the same time, escaped without any necessary measures, such as stopping the said cargo to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 264,146, such as the exchange of compact lamps, was damaged to the extent that the said cargo was damaged and the Defendant escaped.
3. On July 31, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) committed a traffic accident under the said paragraph (2) by the negligence of a frighting the central line while driving ahead of it in order to cause a traffic accident and escape, as prescribed in paragraph (1), from the 465-Suk-gu, Namyang-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Namyang-do.