However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 20, 2017, at the main point operated by the victim C in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 03:00 on June 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim to pay the drinking value and return home to the Defendant; (b) on the ground that the victim demanded the victim to pay the drinking value to the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant

“The victim’s main store operation was obstructed by force by putting the hump on the floor with a large sound and dumping the floor.”

2. On June 20, 2017, at the above main station around 03:43, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that he paid the liquor value to the Defendant and returned home to the Defendant by the superintendent of the police box of the Seoul Heavy Police Station D Police Station, which was called upon 112 reported, and that he was called as a bridge to interfered with the business by getting the Defendant up on the floor and going up on the floor, and he was seated up on the floor, the Defendant’s interference with the performance of official duties to the above E.

Nar calculated Mazz.

“In doing so with a large voice, the face of the above E was taken once, and the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of his duties concerning the dispatch of the report at 112.

3. 모욕 피고인은 제 2 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 성명 불상의 손님들이 있는 자리에서, 위 E 등과 함께 현장에 출동한 경찰 관인 피해자 F( 여, 23세) 이 피고인에게 술값을 계산하고 귀가하라는 취지로 말했다는 이유로 피해자에게 “ 야 이 씨발 년 아! 내가 뭘 잘못했냐

h. h. h.b. h.b. h.h.

n. Lina Lina Lina Lina

In a large sound, “the victim was openly insulting.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E (includingF statement);

1. A president of the F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to invoices and field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Legal provisions;