Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who performs the general affairs of the singing class held at the C community service center located in the petition-gu B at the meeting of the defendant, and the victim D (the age of 57) is a singing instructor of the said singing class.

At around 11:20 on February 6, 2020, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim by openly pointing out the phrase “the victim would have been elected as a person who will deliver an official announcement well,” in relation to the election of executive officers of the singing class, on the 3rd class of the said community service center, on the ground that the victim’s neglect of the general secretary himself/herself, 40 members of the singing class, who are the members of the singing class.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of damage, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., even if comprehensive consideration of the circumstances before and after the crime is given, it does not seem that the punishment of a summary order is too heavy. Thus, the punishment shall be determined as same as the summary order.