beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.12.05 2013고정2621

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 High Court Decision 2621] On April 20, 2013, the Defendant, at around 10:55, obtained the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount from the victim as he/she did not pay the food value, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the food value. However, as if he/she would pay the price, he/she received the same amount of money from the victim as he/she did not pay the price.

[2013 High Court Decision 2622] On June 2, 2013, the Defendant, at around 13:30, obtained the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount from the victim by taking advantage of the fact in the “G cafeteria” operated by the Victim F in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, notwithstanding the lack of intent or ability to pay the food value. However, the Defendant, as if he would pay the price, did not pay the price, by making the amount equivalent to KRW 12,00,000, such as one chil, and the small chil 2,000, and did not pay the price.

[2013 High Court Decision 2623] On June 4, 2013, the Defendant acquired the same amount of monetary benefits from the victim as the Defendant did not pay the same amount of money because the Defendant did not pay the same amount of money in the “J store” operated by the Victim I in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, despite the lack of intent or ability to pay the food value.

[2013 High Court Decision 2624] The Defendant, on March 16, 2013, obtained the pecuniary profit of KRW 19,000 from the victim, on the ground that he did not pay the food value, even though he did not have an intention or ability to pay the food value, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the food value. The Defendant, on the part of the victim LA cafeteria located in Suwon-si from around 16:00 to 17:30,000, as he would have paid the completion amount, by making one bit 3 bottles equivalent to KRW 9,00,000, and did not pay the completion amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement [2013 High Court Decision 2621]

1. Statement by the police about C (victim);

1. Invoice and photographs (2013, 2622);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A receipt (2013 fixed 2623);

1. I.D.