On February 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around the frequency of incomprehion in the Jinnam market located in the Jinnam market, “The Defendant saw to scrap wastes removed from the Samil Middle School and the Middle Middle Elementary School.” (b) at C, the right to remove the said schools was also granted to the said schools; (c) upon obtaining the right to remove the scrap metal and the right to remove from the surrounding areas of the said schools, the Defendant said that the Defendant loaned the cost of lease of the lave show shower, a building material scrap scrapr, to the Party.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was merely responsible for crushinging the removed wastes around the above schools, and did not have to obtain the right to remove the above schools from C, and as such, the Defendant did not intend to file the said scrap with the victim because it was given to the High Railroad D while crushinging as above.

As above, the Defendant received 10 million won from the victim’s false statement to the Defendant’s E bank account in the name of the E on the same day from the date from the victim, and from that time the Defendant received 10 million won from that date.

3. From March 31, 200 to March 31, 2000 won was remitted in total on three occasions as shown in the annexed list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A detailed statement of victims' payments;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Submission of evidentiary materials, etc. by victims);

1. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the pertinent provision of the criminal facts; (b) Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment; (c) the reason for sentencing of sentence [decision of imprisonment] fraud [decision of the recommended area] / [decision of the recommended area] basic area / [the scope of recommendation] / [decision of the sentence] six to one year / six months / [the scope of recommendation] / [decision of the sentence] ] the defendant recognizes and reflects the criminal act; (d) the fact that the health is not good is favorable conditions or fraud amount; and (e) no repayment is made even after the considerable period has elapsed.