도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On July 2, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year at the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 10, 2020.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;
A. On September 20, 2019, at around 18:05, the Defendant driven a car for E-Pacific at approximately 500 meters under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.118% at a section of approximately 500 meters for the front of B via D located in C from the Do of the Gangwon Yangyang-gun.
B. The Defendant above A.
Despite the fact of violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, around 09:10 on September 21, 2019, the above car was driven in the state of 0.171% alcohol concentration at approximately 25km from the Do in front of the Gangwon Yangyang-gun B to the 4-1 North-1 North Korean intersection.
2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car in E-Pas.
On September 21, 2019, at around 09:10, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol concentration of 0.171% 0.10%, and driven the said car on a two-lane road in front of G in the Gangwon Yangyang-gunF at a two-lane 40km at a speed of 40km from a two-lane boundary in the two-lane boundary. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the driver by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes.
Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so at the front time, and was due to negligence in the course of the operation, and was driven by the victim H, who was in the atmosphere of the Madles signal at the front time, and received the part of the Madra car as the front part of the Madra car.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim H and his her son, each of the above occupational negligence, in need of two weeks medical treatment.