A. The Defendant, who is an accomplice, had 50% of the revenues and losses, divided the Defendant’s 50% of the revenues and losses from the instant crime, and the actual profits and losses that the Defendant acquired due to the instant crime are smaller than KRW 1,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, confiscation, and surcharge 7.87 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake in the calculation of additional charges, i.e., (1) the court below stated that (2) the defendant was employed by the defendant as a monthly salary and food belt from the defendant and worked at the sexual traffic business establishment of this case as an employee, and that there was no agreement between the defendant and the defendant to have 50% of the earnings in addition to the advance payment received (1.0 million won in the trial record 190,192). (2) The defendant invested 30 million won in order to take over the sexual traffic business establishment of this case, and even if thereafter, he did not share the above acquisition price. (59 pages of the investigation record) The defendant also stated by the investigative agency as the president and the employee of B (59 pages of the investigation record), (3) the defendant was found to have been employed by the defendant and reported the business of the defendant by telephone or text, etc. (2300,235 days in the investigation record, and 25 days in the remaining account transfer price of the defendant.