However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 16, 2015, at around 02:45, the Defendant, within the “C” main point of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si B, committed an assault by the police officer on the right side side of the police officer, including walking cars, who was sent to the scene after receiving a report of the above main line of duty, and was arrested as a flagrant offender at the scene of the assault case against the police officer E, and the police officer F, who was demanded to accompany the police officer to accompany the police officer to a nearby D police box, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order by assaulting the police officer’s security.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. E statements;

1. Service log of a police box, details of handling 112 reported cases, and public officials' certificates of identification;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field and victim G, F damaged parts, such as photographs, ctv video closure photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., that the defendant reflects his mistake and that the defendant