beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.12.22 2016나22493

대여금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts that: (a) the Defendant lent KRW 19 million on April 19, 2014; (b) KRW 7 million on April 22, 2014; and (c) KRW 10 million on May 14, 2014; and (d) KRW 19 million on May 14, 2014.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 2, the Plaintiff’s transfer of KRW 19 million to the Defendant on April 19, 2014, KRW 7 million on April 22, 2014, and KRW 14 million on May 14, 2014.

However, the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4-1, 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5-1 through 5, 8, and 9, and each of the following facts or circumstances, i.e., the plaintiff and the defendant started to come to come to come to come to go through a school with an introduction of a person around January 2014, and around May 2014, the apartment was leased to the defendant under the name of the defendant and living together with the defendant around September 2014. In this case, the plaintiff and the defendant did not have any other evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff loaned the above apartment as rent Nos. 17 million won to the defendant, and the defendant did not have any other evidence to prove that the plaintiff loaned the above apartment as rent Nos. 9, 1600,000 won to the plaintiff before the settlement of the facts and evidence No. 2, 2015.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be delivered with this conclusion.