If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant asserted that he was created by the D High School of the former president C and the E former Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor and the former president came to know in the process of the election campaign by the former president C, and requested the victim F who was promoting agricultural product sales in the Seoul subway Station around January 2010 to provide assistance in connection with the rent of the store in the subway station by mediating their friendship with those related to Seoul.

1. On February 10, 2010, at the coffee shop in the shift of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government's Seocho-dong, stating, "The Seoul Mayor and the Director General of the Seoul Metropolitan Government transportation Bureau have been promised at the intervals of up to one million won for the rent of commercial buildings because he/she received one million won in cash from the victim on February 10, 201;

2. On February 20, 2010, in H restaurants located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “The Seoul Mayor and the Director General of Seoul Metropolitan Government for the large expenses to be contributed to gifts” was issued one million won check at tin.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to demand the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Transportation Bureau and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Transportation Bureau to demand the store rent.

Accordingly, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of receiving one million won in cash and one million won check from the accused accused and receiving them, and at the same time soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense; Article 111 of the Attorney-at-Law Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;