beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.04.25 2018고단455

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant will pay 100 million won to the applicant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 Highest 455" is an insurance designer belonging to the Dong life insurance company located in Busan Metropolitan City from around 2009 to around 2017.

1. On March 28, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E calls from the victim E, who was not in Busan, to pay money to the victim E, within a prompt time when he/she loans money used for business expenses.

“.......”

However, in fact, the Defendant had already been liable for several million won or more and did not have any property or deposit in the name of the Defendant. The income from insurance business was used for the repayment of the existing debt, installment of the vehicle, operating expenses, etc. It was not left. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay even if he/she borrowed money from the victimized party because of the situation where the Defendant continued to operate his/her business with money borrowed from others and the Defendant paid the insurance money on behalf of others.

Nevertheless, on March 28, 2012, the Defendant, as seen above, received 16,720,000 won under the name of the national bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, by deceiving the victim as above, and received 118,576,00 won in total under the name of borrowed money or investment money from the victim nine times from February 5, 2013 as shown in the attached crime list (1).

2. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant against the victim G is accompanying the investment company while engaging in insurance design work, with respect to the victim G, who was located in the Buddhist area H (H) around 1, 2014.

If an investment is made in the accompanying investment company, the principal shall be paid after one year, and 1.5% of the principal of each month may be paid as a return on investment.

“.......”

However, in fact, the defendant continues to bear the obligation in excess of the obligation under Paragraph 1.