However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on February 11, 2009, a summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime, etc. in the same court on February 11, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime on April 20, 2012 from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court.

On August 29, 2015, at around 23:45, the Defendant driven an Epoter cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.211% from the front side of the C parking lot located in the following city B to D in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry about the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Records before judgment: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, and copies of each summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation: Considerations, such as the fact that there appears to repent and reflect the wrongs, that there is a family member to be supported and that there is no history of being punished heavier than the fine for the same kind of crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Consideration into consideration in discretionary mitigation);

1. Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;