The punishment of the court below (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant's vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance is a favorable condition.

However, even though the other party's vehicle has been considerably damaged to the extent that it would be scrapped, the other party's vehicle driver left the site as it is, and the other party's driver has driven the vehicle considerably damaged to the extent of the date of postponement, and then the defendant is confisced. The crime of this case is an unfavorable condition, such as the fact that the crime of this case is very poor in light of the nature of the crime in light of the traffic risk and the degree of disability caused, and that the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for a violation of the

Considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant and the unfavorable circumstances, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime; and (b) the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, it is difficult to deem the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.