However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2018, the Defendant assaulted “D community service center” located in Sinsan-gu, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, on the ground that the victim B (n, 37 years of age) who is a public official in charge of issuing evidentiary documents belonging to the above community service center was physically friendly to the mother of the Defendant, who was a public official in charge of issuing evidentiary documents belonging to the above community service center, on the ground that he was influenced by the Defendant’s mother who was the victim’s head, was fleeped, and the left blicks were

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the issuance of evidentiary documents by public officials and legitimate performance of duties related to civil petition processing, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt of the cryp of light that requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Certificate of employment;

1. Photographs (Assaults, face pages, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that public officials who were performing official duties for the reason of sentencing under Articles 32(1)3 and 32(2) and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits for Dismissal of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is not clear, and thus, it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation in the criminal procedure of this case), and inflicted bodily injury upon them, the crime of this case is inferior. However, considering the fact that public officials committed the crime of this case while making an objection against the victim's behavior against the mother of the horses, the punishment is determined as ordered in light of the circumstances that may be taken into account in light of the circumstances, reflects, and all other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.