However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court’s Port Branch.

On November 2, 2019, around 01:10, the Defendant driven an E 3 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 00 percent alcohol concentration of about 0.13% from the south-gu D apartment at port to the front road of the south-gu D apartment at port at port.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same attached power);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act [The choice of imprisonment and the degree of blood alcohol concentration shall be taken into account];

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that a fine for a drunk driving has been sentenced once and that there is no other criminal records;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;