If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant leased the fourth floor of the building located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and operated a kist room with the trade name of “E by employing female employees D, etc., with four smuggling installed with internal locking devices and shock-type shocking rooms, one shock waiting room for female employees, etc.”

Defendant 1 was aware that female employees, such as the above D, received KRW 3-50,00 from customers when they request, and received KRW 3-50,00 from them, and made a similar act such as “observer” under the name of the customer’s sexual organ.

Nevertheless, at around 16:20 on October 11, 2016, the Defendant received 30,000 won from F, which had been a guest, from F, to provide information on the studio in the above D. The above D received KRW 50,00 from F, and received KRW 50,00 from F, and led to the similarity of F’s sexual organ.

As a result, the defendant provided a place of sexual traffic for business purposes, and provided sexual traffic mediation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Written statements prepared D and F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Photographs (in particular, tamping photographs which are held by customers, and those on the control site photographs in which suspension is found);

1. On May 12, 2015, the non-prosecution decision attached to the report of the previous conviction of the disposition and the result of confirmation was found to be a case where the female employees and customers engaged in the business were engaged in similarity behavior in the instant key room operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant, the main owner of the business, assisted the similarity behavior.

However, on November 2, 2015, the Defendant received a disposition that was not suspected on the ground that there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant arranged it.

[In full view of each of the above evidence, if the defendant wants to have a "observer" term in the key room operated by the defendant, the defendant's act of interference between female employees and customers.