1. Fraud;

A. On January 13, 2013, the Defendant committed a cash delivery crime: (a) at the D office of a limited company D operated by the victim C in Gunsan-si, Si, Gunsan-si; (b) “E is well-known with the vice president, president, and director of the headquarters; and (c) the head of the headquarters’s private relationship with the head of the headquarters is trying to construct a telecom with the Y-si.

D said that 1 million won was changed to be used as entertainment expenses in order to enable the said construction work to be subcontracted.

From the time when the defendant receives remittance of one million won to a new bank account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the person who has believed such remittance, the defendant shall do so.

3. From the day of September, 19, a total of KRW 19,840,00 was received from the injured party as shown in the annexed list 1 of crime inundations.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he/she thought that he/she would use it as his/her entertainment or living expenses, and because he/she did not know the vice president or the chief of the E, he/she did not have any intention or ability to allow D to contract the above construction work.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.

B. The Defendant who committed the crime of using a card gave the victim C a contract for F to this E at the place indicated in paragraph 1(a) around January 1, 2013.

F determined that F’s directors, the head of E’s headquarters, and employees were changed to credit cards to be used when meeting and meeting.

The defendant shall immediately receive a letter of the victim's visa card in the name of the victim and a letter of the national card from the victim's reliance on the same year from that time.

3. Until December 12, 200, a total of KRW 14,378,111 as shown in the Annex II list of crimes was used.

However, the defendant thought that he would use the credit card for his entertainment or living expenses even if he received the credit card from the injured party, and even if he was unable to know the F's directors or employees, he did not intend to use the credit card for the contact even if he was given the credit card from the injured party.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to do so.