손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The grounds for this part of the facts of recognition are as follows: (a) except for the case where “the term” is used as “the term,” as “the term “the term,” as “the term,” of the judgment of the first instance, the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant machinery supplied by the Defendant Company to the Plaintiff is not the same as the machinery indicated in the written estimate for the preparation of the Defendant Company, and there are significant defects in the machinery itself. As such, the Defendant Company is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages arising therefrom as a supplier of the instant machinery. Defendant C, who is the actual operator of the Defendant Company, is obligated to compensate for the damages arising therefrom according to the agreement with the Plaintiff to assume the responsibility for the defects of the instant machinery. Meanwhile, the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the defects of the instant machinery are KRW 135,00,000 (i.e., production volume of KRW 135,00,000,000 (i., production volume of the instant machinery) from March 31, 2014, 205 to September 8, 2015, KRW 2700,000,000, KRW 5050, KRW 4050,505,000).
In addition, the payment of damages for delay is sought.
B. 1) Determination of whether to recognize the Defendant Company’s liability is established should be made prior to having received repairs multiple times due to defects, such as gold damage installed on the presses after the Plaintiff was supplied with the instant machinery.