Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant from April 20, 2016 to the same year.

6. A person who had been employed by the prime City C market prosperity from the fifteenth day to the fifteenth day.

The victim D and E had not embezzled 3 million won in relation to marketing of traditional markets while working as the chairperson and vice-chairperson of the above prosperity conference, and there was no fact that the defendant was unfairly dismissed.

Nevertheless, on October 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) told F to the effect that “the victims embezzled KRW 3 million while engaging in marketing of the traditional markets promotional projects; and (b) the Defendant made a mistake in suspicion thereof; (c) thereby impairing the honor of victims by pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. A resignation and a settlement report of accounts for public relations marketing projects for traditional markets in 2016;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;