If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On April 3, 2016, at around 22:30 on April 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim E (manam and 72 years old) was on the back seat of the F taxi located in the Do branch of Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si and was going to go to the original state of Gangwon-do; (b) however, the Defendant expressed that the victim would not go to other customers on the si because he said that the victim would fall short of the original state at the latest time. (c) on the ground that the victim would be sucking, if she would do so, she would not fright, fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright, and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi business by force for about 15 minutes.

2. At around 22:45 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) recommended the Defendant, who was not a victim, to leave the taxi in front of the H District of the branch police station located in Sungnam-si G, Sungnam-si, to leave the taxi; and (b) deemed the civil petitioners, the Defendant insultd the victims by saying, “Is the victims of the bitch fe, fe, fe, fe, fe, fe, f, fom, nifine, nife, nife, nifs, and flings.e., the victims.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to police statements made to E, J and I;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (a fine shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that each victim I and J deposited an amount of KRW 500,000,000 against the victim I and J, even though the defendant is not responsible for the same kind of crime during the period of repeated crime, the defendant has made an agreement in depth with the victim E);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the amounts);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;