If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00 on December 30, 2014, around the main point of “C” located in “C”, the Defendant continued to drink together; (b) the Defendant would have the victim D house, and (c) was on the top of the KS5 vehicle located in the victim’s possession, and (d) caused the Defendant to walk the said vehicle to take the 2.60,000 won of the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. On the same day, at the defendant's house located in the F apartment No. 101 dong 1401, 1401 in Won-si, Won-si, the victim G (the husband of D) and Si expenses found in the above paragraph 1 in order to comply with the above paragraph 1, the victim's face was 3 times in drinking, and the victim's face was flicked on three occasions in drinking, and the victim's flick part was flicked on one occasion in drinking, and the victim's flick part was flick on the days of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

3. At around 02:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the elevator in order to separate the above D and K from the Defendant’s dwelling site in front of the Defendant’s dwelling site, 112 reported and sent to the said place; (b) the background leading up to the original police station H district; and (c) the police officer in charge of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the official duties, in order for the Defendant to continue to take a bath in order to separate him from the said D and K from the Defendant; (d) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant was able to look at the Defendant’s chest in his hand; (e) the police officer’s chest was fluencing the Defendant’s chest; and (e) the Defendant was flucing the Defendant into the said elevator and the Defendant’s chest on his own first hand, and (e) the Defendant was flucing the Defendant into a brush and flusium.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made in relation to J, I, G, and D;

1. Victims G.