The defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving universal bus B.

On October 4, 2018, the Defendant driven the above bus at around 07:10 on October 4, 2018, while proceeding from the long-term road to the intersection of the Han River, the Defendant did not stop despite the fact that the signal to the Han River was changed to the red, and was done in violation of the signal, and received as the front part of the bus the driving seat of the Dpoter cargo vehicle driven by the victim C, which was driven by the victim C, in accordance with the new title, from the right side of the running direction of the Defendant at the time of the Roman course to the left side of the bus, due to an occupational negligence in violation of the signal and did not stop.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim of the above 8 weeks, such as closed dong bus, breast, etc., the victim E, the passenger of the above bus, and the victim F, for each of about 3 weeks of medical treatment, injury such as chills, tensions, etc., and injury to the victim G, which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement of a traffic accident-related person;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Crimect vs and motion picturecads;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 (Punishment as a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims C with the largest offense) of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant, who is favorable to the defendant for the reason of sentencing of selective sentencing of punishment (the fact that the defendant recognizes his responsibility for the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant subscribed to bus mutual aid) and the fact that the defendant, when causing a traffic accident during unfavorable normal bus operation, is highly likely to lead to a large-scale accident, has entered the intersection in violation of the signal by clearly recognizing the fact that the change is made to the stop signal, and the signal is given by the defendant prior to the change to the moving