beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고정897

협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 19:00 on September 8, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the victim of the victim, she went beyond the face of the victim, and she saw the victim into three times, on the ground that D is together with the victim E (ma, 48 years of age) within the residence of D located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Geum-gu, Busan.

2. On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant expressed the attitude that the victim and D would be informed to the wife of the victim by sending the victim and D’s phone number to the victim’s address at the insular post that was sent to the victim and D for about four (4) months, and sending the victim’s phone number to the victim’s address. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant expressed the view that the victim and D would be informed of the victim’s insular phone from the insular land to the victim E’s cell phone at around 19:59. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant would be subject to reasonable punishment if the crime was committed. On the same day, the Defendant saws any bridge that cannot return to this gender, and then fats, damps, kidsscis and kiscisscis, and the end in the next week.

‘The text message' is sent, and the victim E's cell phone at around 22:24 of the same month will be seen as the victim E's cell phone.

A speaker who does not reply to one another.

B. The author sent to the wife (F) of the victim a letter/mail stating that "I will see the fact that I would like to inform the victim and D's wife of the fact that I would like to inform the victim of the fact that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know the victim and D's identity. I would see that I would see that I would see the bag and bag in the house. I would bag to bag a double-resistant ba

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E and D;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of text messages, Kakao Stockholm outputs, and recording statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;