A. The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

B. However, the above defendants are the defendants.

1. The fraud of Defendant A and Defendant B

A. On December 5, 2012, the Defendants conspired with H to receive insurance proceeds, such as non-repair costs, by driving a her nule or her J-type car with H, intentionally shocking signals, etc., and making it difficult for the Defendants to do so, as if they were slick in snow paths, as if they were slicked in snow paths.

Accordingly, around December 5, 2012, H driven the Defendants on the same mixed car with the above mixed car, and caused the above mixed car to have the signal, etc. on the road in K in Y in Y in Y in Isan-si, and the above mixed car was shocked, and Defendant A reported a false accident as if the accident occurred.

As above, in collusion with H, the Defendants deceivingd the damaged insurance company, and were granted KRW 13,59,00,00 for the non-repair cost for the non-repair of the non-life vehicle, KRW 1,643,720 for the victim KB non-life insurance company, KRW 207,200 for the medical expenses of Defendant A, KRW 240,00 for the treatment expenses of Defendant A, KRW 240,00 for the agreement on Defendant A, KRW 640,00 for the life insurance money of Defendant C, and KRW 27,39,375 for the life insurance money of Defendant B from the victim ING Life Co., Ltd.

B. On April 24, 2013, the Defendants conspired with H to obtain insurance proceeds, such as non-repair costs, by driving a NNA car in the name of Defendant B M with H and intentionally placing it into the farm waterway, and then making it difficult for the Defendants to drive a stroke in the name of Defendant B, with the intention of obtaining insurance proceeds, such as non-repair costs, from an insurance company, as if the Defendants were found to have been farming.

Accordingly, around 04:25 on April 24, 2013, H driven the Defendants on the No.N. 24:25, and led to the roads adjacent to the railway located in the Hagu-Eup in the Hasan-si in the Hasan-si, and H intentionally put the said No. Y into the agricultural waterway by driving the said No. Y. 3, and reported a false accident as if Defendant B was in the agricultural waterway due to the negligence of driving the stroke stroke.

Defendants.