However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of balging balm vehicles with two balms.

On November 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 08:17, and led to the course of the first line along the west west west-gun, west-gun, south, to the parallel parallel west-ri.

At this point, since the road is bended by a bend line with the center line of yellow-ray, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to protect the vehicle line and to operate the steering gear and brake system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got off the front part of the D Poter cargo vehicle, which was driven by the victim C (68 tax) in the opposite lane due to the negligence of balloning the central line, as the above ballon, received the front part of the D 2 B Do cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, on the part of the Defendant, approximately 16 weeks off the open frame between large 16 weeks off to the above C, and on the part of the victim E (the 55 years old) who was the passenger of the said chere truck, about 10 weeks off the left-hand part of the abandonment which requires approximately 10 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on the actual condition of a traffic accident;

1. A map at the scene of an accident and a photo at the scene of an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The crime of this case is not subject to the sentencing guidelines on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance where the defendant invadedd the central line of yellow-ray, thereby causing injury to the victims, and the victim's injury is serious.

However, the fact that the defendant has led to the crime of this case and that the victims have agreed smoothly.