Around February 2009, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for the construction work of this case at the D Office (hereinafter referred to as “D”) located at the site of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul”) with the victim Mine Communication Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd”).

On the other hand, the injured company agreed to pay the wages to on-site workers in the contract amount between D and D at the request of D, and the other contract amount to be paid by the injured company at the request of D. Accordingly, the Defendant also agreed to pay the wages to the on-site workers in relation to D and payment of the subcontract amount in lieu of D by the Defendant at the request of the victimized company on behalf of D, and the other subcontract amount was paid by the Defendant at the request of the Defendant,

When operating expenses at the early March 2009 were insufficient, the Defendant had the intent to claim and receive wages from the person who did not actually work for the victimized company. The Defendant deceiving the victimized company by claiming for wages from February 2009 against F who did not work at the construction site. On March 10, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 2,646,50 from the victimized company to the F’s account under the name of the Defendant’s management, including the remittance of KRW 2,646,50 from March 10, 2009 to December 9, 2010, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the damaged company by deceiving the damaged company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against G, I, and F;

1. Each police statement to J, K, and E;

1. Hearing of an investigation report;