(a) project approval and public notice - General industrial complex development project (L general industrial complex development project): Defendant on December 24, 2015 (L general industrial complex development project) - Public notice, M on December 24, 2015, N on January 25, 2017, and N-project operator:

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on February 27, 2017 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): Each land (hereinafter “each land of this case”) indicated in the column of “subject to expropriation” of the attached list of compensation for losses owned by the Plaintiffs - Compensation for losses: The term “adjudication amount of expropriation” listed in the attached Table of attached hereto is as follows.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on April 13, 2017 - An appraisal corporation and a Samun appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 22, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”): The content of the ruling: The Plaintiffs’ determination on the amount of compensation for losses for expropriation as indicated in the separate sheet on compensation for losses; each increase is made in the same amount as indicated in the separate sheet on compensation for losses - The appraisal corporation: the appraisal corporation substitute appraiser for the appraisal corporation, the Korea appraisal corporation (hereinafter “instant appraisal”)

D. Results of the appraiser's O appraiser's appraisal (hereinafter "the above appraiser's appraisal, and the result of the appraisal is "court's appraisal"): The appraisal statement of compensation for each of the lands of this case as stated in the "amount of compensation for losses" column in the annexed sheet of compensation for losses: the facts that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, 4, and 5 (including each number), the result of the appraiser's O's appraisal, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that compensation for each of the lands of this case was made in the adjudication of acceptance of this case and the adjudication of objection was unfair because the compensation for losses significantly falls short of the market price.

Therefore, the defendant is a legitimate compensation to the plaintiffs in the court's appraisal and the ruling of this case.