도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the driver B, who was the Defendant, violated the vehicle operation restriction around August 7, 200, around 12:49.
2. The part of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8356, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9945, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9974, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9977, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 994, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9977, Oct. 14, 201; Act No. 88, Feb. 30, 2011).
3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under the main sentence of Article 440