2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case; (b) the defendant had the same record in favor of the defendant; (c) the defendant has reached seven times the repeated crime period; and (d) the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period; (b) the contents of the fraudulent crime are not having the intention or ability to pay the price; and (c) the defendant was provided with high-priced share in the main place; and (d) it is not good to commit the crime due to economic difficulties; (b) further, the act of soliciting sexual traffic to juveniles infringes on the human rights of children and juveniles; (c) it is highly likely to be criticized against the defendant because of its violation of sound sexual culture and good morals; and (d) it has not yet reached an agreement with the victim K; and (d) the court below has already determined the punishment by fully taking into account the above circumstances; (d) there is no change of circumstances that could change the defendant's age and character, intelligence and environment; and (e) the motive, means and circumstances after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.