재물손괴
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 5,000,000 won from the victim D a year fee of 1,50,000 won per Hask-dong, one of which is located in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun; and (b) leased 4,50,000 won in total.
However, on May 2015, the Defendant: (a) leased the victim, and (b) leased three (3) dongs to E on the ground that the damaged party did not incur the costs of re-contract for the Hashes leased at the end of May 2015; (c) ordered E to re-let the above three (3) Hashes, which was leased to E, to be the head of the Hashes, and ordered E to pay all the Hashes net of the Hashes located in the Hashes 3 Hashes that were leased to E, and then damaged the Hashes net of the market price in the
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of the witness D;
1. Statement made by the police for F and E;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the following: (a) the accused gave testimony to the victim; and (b) the injured party’s testimony to substitute the crime; (c) the injured party did not fully recover from damage; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, etc. are considered.