2. The judgment is based on the facts that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor, a suspended sentence, and a fine on several occasions due to special larceny; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime; and (c) the Defendant’s violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act requires strict punishment with severe social harm, such as promoting excessive speculative spirit to the general public; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; (b) motive, background, means, methods and consequence of the instant crime; (c) criminal records; and (d) the circumstances before and after the instant argument, etc., the Defendant’s sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable; and (d) the Defendant’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.