The seized 50,000 won (No. 1), 80,000 won (No. 2) shall each be included.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of the denied D (a disposition of suspending indictment on the same day) and the name of “F” on the E and the second floor in Asia-si.

The defendant from April 2014 to the same year.

7. From the point of time until July 17, 7, 7 was equipped with a 60 square meter, 7 shower room, 2 shower room, etc., which had been employed by the female, and had the female find the place, and then received 300,000 won as the price for the sexual traffic from unspecified men suffering from finding the said place, and 100,000 won per hour, and then had the female sexual traffic stimulates the sexual organ of the female with mouth or hand, so that the female sexual traffic may stimulates the sexual organ of the female.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Images of control site photographs;

1. Application of each existing statute of 40,000 won, 500 won, 10,000 won and 80,000 won, which is confiscated;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not less than one month but not more than seven years;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (decision of types), the number of persons who have no type 2 (the arrangement, etc. of sexual traffic by business), among the crimes of sexual traffic, brokerage, etc. for sexual traffic (the scope of recommendations) (the scope of recommendations), shall be between 6 months and 1 year and 4 months.

3. Determination of sentence: In light of the fact that the defendant in August has committed the instant crime, a sentence of imprisonment to the defendant is inevitable, considering the fact that he/she committed the instant crime again even though he/she had the record of having been sentenced one time to imprisonment or one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment;

In addition, the defendant's business period cannot be deemed to be shorter, the installation of CCTV to monitor the surroundings of the business establishment in preparation for the police control, etc. is not good.