However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 23, 2020, at around 22:50, the Defendant asked the victim E (Nam, 27 years old) who was the captain of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D police station that called “C” and called “C” after receiving 112 reports on his body in front of the toilet located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and asked the victim E (Seoul, 30 years old) to ask questions about his personal information from the police officer assigned to the police officer of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D police station that called “C,” and puts his breath of the above E, and carried out his breath of the broth, and carried out the breath of the broth of the above E, and carried out the broth of the broth from the victim F (Seoul, 27 years old) who was a policeman assigned to the above police box.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the above police officers’ legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of 112 reported cases, protection of the lives, bodies and property of the people, prevention, suppression, investigation of crimes, etc., and at the same time, damaged scambling and scambling, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the police officers E, and inflicted injury on the police officers F in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the right hand hand hand hand and hand, and other parts of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter to E and F;

1. Application of the statutes governing damaged photographs and documentary evidence CDs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against E and F of Articles 40, 50, and each of the crimes of injury to each other, and the crimes of obstruction of official duties against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as the punishment imposed against F of the heavier penalty, if they committed an act of assault or intimidation, multiple crimes of obstruction of official duties are established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties. The above acts of assault or intimidation committed the same opportunity at the same place, and if they are deemed to be one act under the social concept, multiple crimes of obstruction of official duties are crimes of concurrence.