2. The crime of this case is a case in which the defendant committed the crime of this case with the victim's own refeasible power and acquired a considerable amount of money from the victim through a 2-year period after reliance, and the quality of the crime is not weak.

However, the damage recovery was almost not made in addition to the interest paid in the course of defraudation.

In addition to these circumstances, comprehensively taking account of the various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.