An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

On November 26, 2014, at around 20:58, the Defendant damaged the property amounting to KRW 990,000 at the market price by cutting sound from the “D” bank operated by the Victim B in Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Sincheon-si, without justifiable reasons, and exposing the precious metal display site and walking visibility, which is owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. B written statements;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Written estimate, etc.;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Articles 32(1)3 and 32(2) and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is not clear; (b) the Defendant did not appear in the trial; (c) the recovery of damage was not made; (d) the victim did not have any unfavorable circumstances and degree of damage; and (e) the fact that the degree of damage was not much significant