beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.10.31 2017고정721

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A game products-related business entity shall not promote speculation by providing free gifts, etc., and in cases of all game products used by the business of providing youth games, free gifts not exceeding 5,000 won shall be provided according to the standards prescribed by Presidential Decree, and a juvenile game providing business entity shall comply with the business hours (from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, the Defendant stated “2017” in the official book in the 2016 official book, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error, thereby recognizing it.

12. From around 23 to 10:00 on March 28, 2017, the Defendant’s “F” in Dong-gu, Ulsan-si, operated by the Dong-gu, “F-gu, extraction of a figure,” 24 hours of business without any time limit, thereby violating the rules of business hours. The entire use of the game providing business by displaying and providing 17 games, which are game water, led to the promotion of speculation by providing a figure of 10,00 won or more of the consumer selling price, while displaying and providing 17 games, which are game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Among the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect of the defendant, a statement to the effect that the defendant has conducted a business of extracting the body of persons provided as free gifts, and that he/she has conducted a business for 24 hours;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel for each investigation report

1. As to the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry through the provision of free gifts, which encourages the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel, it does not constitute a case where the given gifts in the judgment fall under a game which is relatively weak in friendlyness, and thus, is not a case where the offer of free gifts is made in the judgment, but rather a man-made race, and there is no provision of free gifts.

2. The defendant's act of offering free gifts for the following reasons (the facts or circumstances are recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court) is prohibited by the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry.