However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 18, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and KRW 3 million as a fine in the same court on September 24, 2013.

On October 11, 2019, at around 11:39, the Defendant driven a FIsta car under the influence of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.057% from the front side of the “C” to the front side of the “E” located in D, at approximately 7.1km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving and a report on actual condition survey;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal history records, reply reports, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, or the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of imprisonment shall be suspended by taking account of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, even though he/she has been punished again for the crime related to road traffic, the defendant repents his/her mistake, and there is no criminal history exceeding the fine, etc., and an incidental disposition shall be imposed to prevent recidivism.